Iva Ugrčić Plays Doina Rotaru’s “Dream Music”

cover

ROTARU: Il Pianto del Ghiaccio (Lament for the Glaciers) for Flute Quartet. Elegy for Flute & Piano. Salcia (Weeping Willow) for Flute & Percussion Ensemble. Aux portes du rêve for Flute & Percussion. Dragonfly for Solo Piccolo / Iva Ugrčić, fl/a-fl/bs-fl/pic; Satoko Hayami, pno; Dave Alcorn, James McKenzie, Garrett Mendelow, Michael Kaszewski, perc / Music & Arts Programs MA-1307

Serbian flautist Iva Ugrčić began her career as a ballet dancer who switched to playing the flute when a visiting professor of that instrument visited her ballet class. This album is her tribute to the dream-like music of 72-year-old Romanian composer Doina Rotaru, whose work is described by the record company as “tonal” but which, in fact, inhabits a very surreal dream world all her own. Indeed, the composer’s home page states that she makes use of “sound and timbre patterns going back to the primary (Romanian and Far Eastern) transgeographcal folklore” as well as “circular and spiral shapes.” These influences give her pieces the atmosphere of “dream music” in the most accurate sense of that term. It is, in fact, exactly the kind of music one hears in one’s dream states. Of the pieces included here, Il Pianto, Aux portes and the Elegy are first recordings.

There are so many things going on in Rotaru’s music, despite the fact that the majority of it is slow and generally quiet, and it is difficult to describe, but one thing that strikes the listener immediately is that she uses a good amount of microtonal slides for the instruments she writes for, mostly chamber music for wind instruments. For this reason, I find her to be an artistic descendant of Julián Carrillo and Harry Partch, the early 20th-century pioneers of microtonalism, and this also explains why most of her scores are chamber works for wind (and occasionally string) instruments: only recently (2019) has she written a piece for orchestra, in fact a chamber orchestra.

Of course, there is more to Rotaru’s music than just microtonalism. In the opening work, Il Pianto del Ghiaccio, she adds “buzzing” effects for the flautist, in fact four flautists, although Ugrčić plays all four instruments herself. This is one reason why I mentioned Harry Partch as well as Julián Carrillo. It is “dream music” with a strong emotional pull, and there are also elements of it that reminded me of whale songs. Once in a while, as towards the end of this first piece, she does indeed toss in a bit of melody, but that is not what she is primarily about. She sets up strange moods in her scores which suck the listener inward. Although there is clearly a progressive musical pattern in her music, and despite its being played in a very linear fashion, conventional structural analysis of this music is not only difficult but futile. It is, as I indicated earlier, “dream music,” and in that somewhat vague description lies a wealth of subtle little traps that ensnare the listener and will not let him or her go.

In the Elegy, for instance, Rotaru uses the piano primarily as a percussion instrument, playing sparse notes (mostly, but not always, in the bass range) behind the flute. The composer’s allusion to Far Eastern influences is quite evident here as elsewhere, and this is an “elegy” which, surprisingly, builds to a powerful musical climax about 3/4 of the way through. Nor is Rotaru’s form of musical progression easy for the ear to follow, as it seems to morph rather than “develop” in the accepted sense of most Western music. Here, in fact, the music just sort of melts into nothingness as the piano plays a trill with a diminuendo at the end.

Salicia (Weeping Willow) is a surprisingly accurate description of the music as it “weeps” through the use of slow descending chromatic slides. One of the instruments doing the sliding is, of course, the flute, but the other sounds like a piccolo but is not. Possibly a musical saw or something like it? It’s not identified, yet one can clearly hear vibraphone (or perhaps amplified marimba), chimes and a large cymbal. Most of the piece is quiet, but it does have a crescendo at one point and, later, it morphs into quite explosive music, with the drums taking over. Here, Rotaru’s dream-music is especially abstract in form; it is very much a piece to be experienced and not analyzed.

Indeed, the question that kept coming into my mind as I listened to this album was, “Through what crucible did this music filter through Rotaru’s mind, and who, exactly, is her target audience? To a certain extent, this is very much “women’s music” in the classic sense of that term, but it appeals as much to the inner strength women have as to their sensibilities. Its hypnotic qualities put a spell on the listener(s), but more in a subtle, seductive manner than an aggressive one. One thing that I found most interesting about it is that, for all these seductive qualities, it is not sappy, soporific music. There is real meat in these works; it’s just not set up in obvious classical structures.

The final piece, Dragonfly for solo piccolo, is apparently one of Rotaru’s more popular pieces since it has been recorded at least twice before. This makes sense, since it is both a short piece and a flashy one, descriptive of its subject. Although more atonal, it bears a striking resemblance to one of the more unjustly overlooked violin pieces ever written, of the same name, by violinist Albert Spalding.

This album is very highly recommended to those who love good modern music. Rotaru is a composer who doesn’t try to do too much in her works, yet who paradoxically accomplishes a great deal through her deft and creative use of her musical materials. She is a sculptor in sound whose music will elevate you to an entirely new plane of existence.

—© 2024 Lynn René Bayley

Follow me on Facebook (as Monique Musique)

Check out the books on my blog…they’re worth reading, trust me!

Standard

David Leon’s “Bird’s Eye”

Cover Leon Bird's Eye

BIRD’S EYE / You won’t find it by yourself. Ay-Ya. Nothing Urgent, Just Unfortunate. to speak in flowers. A Night for Counting Stars. Secret Footshake. Expressive Jargon I & III. Infatuation Station. Secret Handshake. Palmetto / David Leon, a-sax/s-sax/a-fl/pic; DoYeon Kim, gayagum/voc; Lesley Mok, dm/perc/glock / Pyroclastic Records PR-32

This album, due for release on March 8, is a new album by Miami-born saxist-composer David Leon. It represents the fruits of his studying with percussionist Manley “Piri” Lopez, who helped Lopez get in touch with his Cuban roots. Yet, oddly, this new trio includes an Asian gayagum player, and percussionist Lesley Mok includes a glockenspiel in these recordings! Thus Bird’s Eye is what you might call a cultural olio rather than a homogenous Latin album.

These artistic choices made by Leon make the music, in my view, much more fascinating than if it had been a “purely” Latin album. He and his groupmates explore a wide range of timbral and rhythmic devices to give these pieces a sound that transcends any ethnic sensibilities. On the contrary, both the Latin and Asian influences help to create music that is extraordinary fluid both rhythmically and harmonically. If Leon were not listed as the composer of all these works, I would swear they were all improvised into being. In fact, this entire album seems to be influenced as much by avant-garde tenor saxist Ivo Perelman as by any ethnic strains.

Because of the extremely fluid nature of these works, musical description is extremely difficult. Leon either takes cues from Kim and Mok or provides cues to them; yet since so many passages are played simultaneously by the first two, you have to assume that more of this music is written out than in the case of Perelman’s peregrinations. There is also a lot of “space” in this music, as if Leon and company were thinking constantly while playing and at times were not entirely certain where to go from point A.

Ay-Ya is based more on Latin rhythm than the opener, You Won’t Find It By Yourself, yet to describe this as Latin jazz would not be entirely accurate. It is Latin jazz in the abstract, and although there is less space in this piece, it quickly morphs into what one may describe as musical pointillism. Leon moves in and out of various musical spaces, using the soprano sax on this track. The album’s title comes to the forefront of one’s mind; there is a certain influence of birdsong here, made more and more obvious as the music continues—and continues to deconstruct. Yet, at the end, he returns to the opening theme to kind of tie it all together.

One difference I felt in this album, as opposed to Perelman’s recordings, was a certain dry sense of humor: not that Leon doesn’t take what he does seriously, but that he is truly “playing” with the music in the classic sense of the word. This is especially true in Nothing Urgent, Just Unfortunate, where he uses multiple themes in different rhythms, juxtaposing them to create a tapestry of sound. (I know this is going to sound strange, but while listening to this album I kept thinking of Charles Mingus’ composing style and the eclectic mixture of themes, rhythms and tempos he used in them. I wonder if Leon was influenced in any way by Mingus.)

Timbral sounds also seem to be something that this trio has fun working with. The lean sound of the trio has something to do with this, of course; a gayegun, which sounds very much like a gamelan, provides a sort of metallic-guitar timbre which constantly plays against Leon’s reeds, and he seems to favor the soprano sax over the alto or the alto flute, all of which he plays on this album. You might say that, in a certain way, this music is as much if not more of a Zen koan as an exploration of Cuban rhythms. Certainly, such well-known Latin-American composers as Chico and Arturo O’Farrill, Perez Prado and Johnny Richards would not recognize any of this music as Latin, but in a sense it is better because it is not locked into a very specific and narrow range of tempi or rhythms. (This is the reason why, although I like Latin jazz, I’m not enamored of it; most of it sounds too much alike to me.)

The major difference between what Leon does here and what Perelman usually does is that there is usually some sort of pulse to the music, and this gives it a forward momentum despite the frequent deceleration, pauses and sidetracks they put into it. Nonetheless, when listening to Leon’s very abstract and almost pointillistic solo spots, there are obvious similarities. (This is my way of saying that David Leon is probably an admirer of Ivo Perelman, whether at first or second hand.) Yet there are several moments in each of these pieces where the music “dances,” no matter how irregular or fragmented the beat, and this is something Perelman never really accomplishes. He approaches music from a different aesthetic angle.

Do-Yeon Kim

Do-Yeon Kim

to speak in flowers is played almost (but not quite) entirely by gayagum and percussion; Leon does not enter (on alto) until nearly 3/4 of the way through it, and when he does the gayagum becomes merely an accompanying instrument although it does occasionally play lines simultaneously with Leon’s alto. A Night for Counting Stars features Leon on alto flute, playing a repeated little rhythmic riff, with Kim singing a few words in the background.

Yet in such abstract music, it’s almost self-defeating to try to describe it. You gain much more from just listening and experiencing it than you would from reading about it, anyway. Unless one is purposely writing words to music as in the case of an art song or an opera, words as such rarely convey what one can get from the sounds of the instruments (and Kim’s voice) themselves. Indeed, if anything, the music becomes more and more abstract as the album progresses, yet all of it engages the listener because you never know where the music is going, yet it is all interesting—and that, to me, is the height of creativity.

If you enjoy highly creative yet abstract jazz, this album is definitely for you.

—© 2024 Lynn René Bayley

Follow me on Facebook (as Monique Musique)

Check out the books on my blog…they’re worth reading, trust me!

Standard

More Music of Louis Karchin

10 - Louis Karchin cover

KARCHIN: Sonata-Fantasia / Stephen Drury, pno / Quintet for Winds / Windscape: Tara Helen O’Connor, fl; Randall Ellis, ob; Alan R. Kay, cl; David Jolley, Fr-hn; Frank Morelli, bsn / 3 Images / Michael Stephen Brown, pno / Summer Song / Marianne Guthfeldt, cl / A Jersey Reverie on New York Notes / Han Chen, pno / Processions / Carson Cooman, org / Bridge 9586

I’ve reviewed two previous CDs of music by Louis Karchin, one of which (Five Compositions) really grabbed me, thus I took a chance on this one. What I liked about Karchin’s music in that second album was that “much of this music had the same kind of hypnotic impact of Szymanowski’s scores, which is indeed a compliment.”

The opening Sonata-Fantasia on this CD is not as opaque as Szymanowski; it is a wide-awake piece, excitable in its forward drive and built around unusual bitonal chord progressions. It also has a strong if asymmetric rhythmic drive, yet in the end the music is difficult to describe. It really has to be heard to be appreciated. Karchin’s theme, as such, and its development are both tersely stated. using angular jumps in the music as sort of a “launching pad” for the music. It is, then, in a sonata-fantasia form, but sounds more like an excitable, bitonal extended étude. As the piece progresses through its 14 minutes, it changes tempo and volume, becoming sparser and calmer in the middle, and here it does resemble Szymanowski. Despite the almost constant use of leaps and keyboard trills, Karchin manages to give the music considerable variety. Nothing in it is predictable, yet all of it is interesting and makes sense. Pianist Stephen Drury not only has an excellent technique but also an excellent sense of the drama of the piece; he “feels” the musical and mood shifts perfectly, engrossing the listener in the ongoing musical drama. Although this piece was written in Covid Year 2020, the liner notes indicate that this did not influence its composition. Karchin wrote it for pianist Drury simply because he is a friend and colleague of long standing whose work he admires. Personally, I thought this a truly great work. Karchin was able to transcend the basic elements involved to hold the listener’s attention throughout.

The following Wind Quintet is also an interesting piece, but perhaps in a bit too similar a vein. The use of short, jumpy motifs to construct the opening “Con spirito” is just a bit too much like the Sonata-Fantasia…at least close enough to sound like another movement of it. Not only that, but Karchin also uses the same techniques in putting it together, the only difference is that here he tosses his motifs back and forth between members of the quintet rather than having just a piano to play them. And yet the music struck me as somewhat lighter in mood and more quixotic than the Sonata-Fantasia, a more lightweight relative, you might say. The second-movement “Maestoso” is somewhat different from the slow section of the sonata: moodier and using the specific timbres of the wind instruments to make its impact. I’ve given high praise on this blog to flautist Tara Helen O’Connor as a soloist as well as to this group of hers, Windscape, in the past. Her/their performances never disappoint and are always interesting. The music in the “Scherzando”  is more fragmented (stop-and-go) than in the sonata, which I found both intriguing but also more puzzling. There’s a certain fragmentary quality about it that I’m not sure I liked. The concluding “Prestissimo,” however, is all bustle and good humor but, for me, went on far too long, a little over six minutes, and thus overstayed its welcome.

Three Images, the only work on this disc written for an artists that Karchin did not know personally, is described as lighter than the Sonata-Fantasia, with each movement linked to “a programmatic allusion,” its three movements titled “Festival,” “Labyrinth” and “Carousel.” Again, we are in much the same tempo, rhythm and even key as the previous two works. I’m not saying that every piece Karchin writes is like this, but the music on this CD is all a bit too much alike which gives the impression that every piece he writes sounds like these (which is not the case). A bit more variety would have been welcome, and this is what we get in the second piece, “Labyrinth,” which has a longer melodic line and a more sostenuto feel to the music, and in “Carousel” Karchin is more playful than usual, using a single-note bitonal theme in a rhythm that is primarily, but not consistently in 6/8.

Summer Song for solo clarinet is yet another bustling bitonal romp, here often build around arpeggios which alternate with slow passages played in the instrument’s middle and low registers. We then get another contrasting piece in A Jersey Reverie on New York Notes, not only one of the finest pieces on this CD but also one of the deepest emotionally. It is based on Charles Wuorinen’s New York Notes, using the first seven notes of its third movement as its starting point, later developing a theme that almost sounds fugal. With this sparser style, Karchin reveals his deeper side, and this piece most definitely has a kinship with Szymanowski.

The finale, Processions for organ, is also a departure from most of the earlier pieces, sounding very “churchy” although with modern harmonies. It’s a good piece that holds the listener’s interest although not quite on the level of Jean Guillou’s or Naji Hakim’s out-there organ music.

As mentioned throughout this review, a bit too much of the music sounds alike, to which I fault the programming on the CD. A Jersey Reverie and Processions should have been placed between some of the peppy-bitonal works heard in succession earlier on in order to break up the sameness of mood and key, but overall this is a good disc, very representative of Karchin as a composer.

—© 2024 Lynn René Bayley

Follow me on Facebook (as Monique Musique)

Check out the books on my blog…they’re worth reading, trust me!

Standard

Fred Lerdahl’s “Inner Life”

01 - Fred Lerdahl cover

LERDAHL: Inner Life, a Cycle for Two Pianos / Quattro Mani: Steven Beck, Susan Grace, pno / Bridge 9582

This CD, Volume 7 in Bridge Records’ ongoing series of music by Fred Lerdahl, presents just one long work, his 45-minute cycle Inner Life for piano duo. Lerdahl describes it in the booklet as his “pandemic work. Forging its world of intricate expressive forms was a refuge of the imagination during this strange and solitary time.” He, and other composer who seemed so freaked out about the pandemic, should live my life. I’m alone most of the time because I’m disabled and only go out of the house once a month to get my hair cut and styled. Otherwise, if it weren’t for emails and my once-a-week phone call to my only friend in Cincinnati, I wouldn’t have any contact with others at all. And yet I manage to keep living. How ‘bout that?

Back to the music, however, Lerdahl’s attraction to two-piano music stems from 1962, when he was a freshman at Lawrence College and heard Olivier Messiaen and his wife, Yvonne Loriod, perform Messiaen’s Visions de l’amen while on their American tour. Prior to this piece, Lerdahl arranged his orchestral work Quiet Music for two pianos which he stated was played brilliantly by Quattro Mani, thus he had no fears about writing this long work (as piano duo music goes) for them.

The opening movement, “Embedded Loops,” opens with a few simple notes played in the upper register of one of the pianos. As Lerdahl describes it,

Each of its ideas begins in embryo, expands, and then contracts in modified form back to its starting point. This process happens on multiple levels, including the overall form, in which the second half mirrors the first.

All of which sounds very cerebral and not the product of deep feeling, but in listening to the music I found that it communicated a great deal of feeling. Lerdahl combines bitonality with a lot of open chord positions, many of which are missing the “root” note. This keeps the harmony in a state of flux even in those moments when it does touch on tonality (mostly in minor modes or keys), but the fast-running passages in the upper range of the keyboard reminded me of an active mind scampering about, perhaps looking for an exit like Alice in that underground hallway that she could not get out of until she drank the magic potion that made her smaller. But Lerdahl doesn’t stop there, and in fact his theme developments are built along traditional lines despite the harmonic uncertainty.

As he said regarding Quattro Mani’s performance of Quiet Music, their performance of Inner Life carries a great deal of emotion, even passion, as they negotiate the tricky passages of the music. Moreover, the recorded sound is both brilliant and just resonant enough to give the listener the feeling that he or she is in the studio, listening to the music as it is being recorded. The generally fast tempo slows down considerably right in the middle of the first movement—in fact, at this point time seems to be suspended as one of the pianists ruminates bitonally in the upper register—an effect I personally thought didn’t work in context but which passes relatively quickly. Oddly enough, the retrograde in the second half, though intellectually interesting, did not have quite the emotional impact of the first half, but such things can be difficult to pull off, particularly when the music is as complex as this is. Towards the end of the movement, a welcome and surprising change of rhythm as the to pianists suddenly begin to “swagger” the music in a rhythmic feeling very close to jazz.

The second movement bears the same title as the complete work. Here, Lerdahl’s music is less rhythmic, less melodic and less obviously structured. The two pianists play short, halting figures, sometimes separately, sometimes with one pianist supporting the other. There are a lot of short pauses in the musical progress which gives the piece a sort of halting sound, yet there are passages where the bass line creates a continuous pattern for at least short periods, and others where the music suddenly explodes in the upper register, only to suddenly change course and return to its semi-halting state once again. It’s hard to explain in words; you really have to hear it to understand what I mean. Yet once again, the music does not follow an expected pattern; by the middle of this movement, all is a flurry of musical activity, some of it quite complex. In the second half, Lerdahl ups the tempo and, at least to my ears, introduces new variants not explored in the first half. It’s quite an interesting piece!

“Solitude,” the finale, is the shortest piece of the three at only 4:55. Here, Lerdahl compresses his musical ideas into a compact yet emotionally moving piece, as if his mind was trapped into a small vortex, pleasant in itself but difficult to break out of—except, again, for a lively interlude right in the middle.

This is a fascinating piece but one that I doubt will find favor among most piano duos. The music makes you listen hard to follow its progress and is not “entertaining” in the least, yet at the same time it is not “modern” in the accepted “edgy” style that seems to be all the rage nowadays. Definitely worth exploring, however, since it is highly creative without being flashy.

—© 2024 Lynn René Bayley

Follow me on Facebook (as Monique Musique)

Check out the books on my blog…they’re worth reading, trust me!

Standard

Garanča’s & Baek’s Fabulous “Samson et Dalila”

Samson

SAINT-SAËNS: Samson et Dalila / Elina Garanča, mezzo (Dalila); Seokjung Baek, tenor (Samson); Lukasz Goliński, bass-bar (High Priest); Blaise Malaba, bass (Abimlech). Thando Mjandana, tenor (Messeger); Goderdzi Janelidze, bass (Old Hebrew); Alan Pingarrón, tenor (1st Philistine); Chuma Sejequa, bar (2nd Philistine); Royal Opera Chorus & Orch.; Antonio Pappano, cond; Richard Jones, dir / Opus Arte DVD OA1371D (live performances: June 10 & 19, 2022)

A lot of water has gone over the dam (and around it, and under it) since we had a stage production of Samson et Dalila that looks anything like Biblical times, and this DVD is proof that the water just keeps on runnin’ and we ain’t getting any closer to a stage production that looks anything like Biblical times. Of course, those older productions, though suggesting Biblical times, those older stage productions were mostly “Hollywoodized” Biblical times. Nobody looked grungy, the sets were lavish, the costumes for Dalila and the High Priest more reminiscent of Cecil B. DeMille than the Old Testament. But at least they looked at least generically Biblical.

According to the publicity blurb on the back of this DVD box, Richard Jones is a “Multi-Olivier Award winning director.” I found some of his direction excellent and some of it unconnected to the story, but nowadays you have to bear in mind that the costume designer (Nicky Gillibrand) and set designer (Hyemi Shin) are of equal importance, and these were mostly ludicrous. I will not beat my point to death, but I ask you, as an operagoer, to defend these images and tell me how they relate to the story of Samson and Delilah:

Photo 1Photo 2

Photo 3

But hey, what do I know? Gillibrand and Shin are highly-paid professions and I’m just a poor crippled nobody who writes reviews. Since they make so much more money than I do and are much more famous, they obviously knows more than I do.

Let us, then, draw the curtain on this travesty of set and costume design and focus on the performance, which is so good that it will dazzle your ears. In fact, I strongly recommend that you play this DVD with the picture minimized. Your imagination can supply a far more interesting and dignified combination of visuals and stage movement than you get here, giving you the finest part of this performance, the singing and conducting.

PappanoAs usual, Pappano’s work is slick, beautifully rehearsed and elegantly flowing but only occasionally tightly dramatic. He is the British counterpart to James Conlon. I respect both conductors because they are unfailingly musical without really loving their work; nonetheless, the elegance with which Pappano leads this performance is so exquisite that I must give him high marks. No musical detail escapes his attention; he obviously knows this score inside and out, and gives you everything that is in it. The Royal Opera Chorus, directed by William Spaulding, is as superb as usual. The choral fugue in the first act is sung as well or better than I’ve ever heard it, and that is NOT an easy feat to pull off. (Just don’t watch it; they’re dressed like modern-day nudniks.) In a way, what Pappano gives us is a very French reading of the score so long as one considers such French conductors as Munch and Prêtre to have been anomalies. His control of dynamics, in particular, is extremely impressive, and he is able to tie all the disparate parts of the opera together to create good structure and a continuous flow.

Seokjong Baek, as Samson, has by far the finest and most exciting dramatic tenor voice I’ve heard in a LONG time. Although he isn’t quite as convincing a stage actor as José Cura or the late Jon Vickers, he is good enough to put over Samson’s character. (In this respect, yes, I give director Jones credit.) His voice is not only firm but ringing; it reminded me of the late James King, except with a richer sound in the low range. Baritone Blaise Malaba, as Abimélech, has a rich and powerful voice but, alas, a consistently wobbly one, but he is musically accurate and characterizes well. By contrast, both of our Philistines have good voices, baritone Chuma Sueqa a bit fluttery but less so than Malaba, and tenor Alan Pingarrón absolutely superb (he could easily sing leading lyric tenor roles).

Polish bass-baritone Lukasz Goliński is our High Priest, and he is also magnificent: a rich, bronze-colored voice that washes over your ears like the balm of Gilead, although he just touches his lowest notes. (I’d love to hear him sing Mosé in Rossini’s vastly underrated Mosé et Pharaon.) As for Elina Garanča, she’s her usual excellent self. I had an issue with her when I first heard her on CD many years ago because of her “sex kitten” approach to Carmen, but she has grown as an artist and the voice was always pleasant, rich and steady, if not truly distinctive in timbre. Listening to her here, in 2022, she bears a striking resemblance to the late Shirley Verrett in middle age, which is by no means a bad thing. Her phrasing, musicality and control of dynamics are all excellent. The famous trio “Je viens celebrer” is sung better here than in any recorded performance I’ve heard since the ancient one by Louise Homer, Enrico Caruso and Marcel Journet. I wish that Pappano had taken the ballet music at a bit of a faster tempo, however.

GarancaA few things I liked about the production were the way they swiftly changed the sets during the Act II introductory music, and Jones’ idea of Dalila finding Abimélech’s dead body just before singing “Amour, viens aider”; this made excellent dramatic sense, as she sings about revenge. I was much taken by Garanča’s excellent acting in this scene, so much better than earlier-age Dalilas of my experience. But I still had to laugh at our High Priest wearing a black jacket and blue jeans. Even in an updated view of the opera, this just doesn’t say “High Priest” to me. Garanča’s print dress also seemed several centuries too modern for me, but at least she looked good in it, and her acting in this scene is entirely convincing, particularly the look on her face when she tells the High Priest that she hates Samson. Pappano pulls this sometimes-rambling scene together beautifully, too. (Yet I wondered about the political implications of the Philistines silently burning a white flag with a Star of David on it; that’s a very touchy topic nowadays.)

The long love duet is also staged pretty well and works in context. There is no extraneous stage business, and Jones keeps the focus on the two protagonists. In this scene, too, Baek reveals that, like Vickers, he can pare down his big voice to an exquisite mezzo-piano when called upon to do so. He’s such an accomplished singer that it’s difficult for me to put it into words that the lay reader will understand. His high range is perfectly placed in the upper mask of the face—as the old Italian teachers called it, “aperto ma coperto,” or “in the dome of the head.” His register break is flawless, which makes his tone completely even from top to bottom with no “dead” notes. No two ways about it, this guy can sing; just listening to him should be a voice lesson to all those tenors out there who have problems with their voices.

In the third act, instead of being chained to a mill and pushing the big wheel around, Samson just stands at the base of a staircase, looking lost, as he sings “Vois ma misère, hélas.” This is patently ridiculous, particularly since the orchestral introduction was specifically written ti simulate the slow grind of the mill wheel, but what a sensitive and intense performance Baek gives of this well-worn aria! It is both dramatic and poetic, immensely touching, and some of the visual effects, such as a group of people suddenly emerging from the darkness onstage, are quite stunning. The ballet is choreographed well if you’re looking for Broadway-style dancing, with the guys having their hands on their hips as they bounce around like sailors on leave. And this, of course, is where the giant slot machine with the clown face comes in, probably symbolizing the decadent life of the Philistines. It makes me sad for the serious and often exquisite work that Pappano brings to this opera, shoved into the background by this kind if idiocy. And yet, when the High Priest again appears, he is now dressed in kind of a High Priest-like costume, which works well. Go figure.

Throughout this last act, Baek’s sensitivity in vocal acting is nearly miraculous, as are the aural effects created by orchestra and chorus behind all the singers. Yet the staging of the final scene makes little sense. Rather than pushing the pillars apart to make the temple fall on the Philistines, Samson simply walks up a staircase (this time with no handrail, and being blind to boot), then shakes the ceiling of the makeshift rectangle (but how does he know it’s there since he can’t see it?) they’re all standing in. This “shaking of the rectangle” magically makes the Philistines fall to the ground as if they were buried in marble. Except they aren’t. (Does this  make any sense to you?)

Although Samson et Dalila has definite links to oratorio, as Pappano points out in his discussion of the opera as a bonus feature—a religious subject, using the chorus as a protagonist and even borrowing a theme or two from Bach—it has always struck me as being too long for audiences to sit through without some visual element despite the richness and complexity of the score. Indeed, the opera is very Wagnerian in the way Saint-Saëns brings the orchestra into play as a dramatic force and blends the arias into the fabric of the score rather than creating “stand there and sing” set pieces. You really need to have a visual element to complement the musical proceedings. If you get this DVD, which I strongly urge you to do, I would watch it at least once straight through and then, upon replaying it, simply minimize the screen and enjoy the richness and power of the musical side of it.  As an audio-only performance of the opera, with the exception of the two subsidiary singers I mentioned, it has no peer, and for this I give full credit to Music Producer Jonathan Allen and Music Mix Engineer Mark Rogers for being able to recreate, on a DVD, the actual sound of a live performance. There is NO OTHER performance of it as consistently excellent in so many ways from start to finish as this one—not even Vickers’ three surviving performances (the studio recording with Gorr and the live performances with Dominguez and Verrett). If you appreciate this opera as much as I do, you have to own this DVD.

—© 2024 Lynn René Bayley

Follow me on Facebook (as Monique Musique)

Check out the books on my blog…they’re worth reading, trust me!

Standard

Re-evaluating Albert Spalding

Spalding

From 1908 through 1953, with the exception of a few years’ service to his country in both World Wars, Albert Spalding was rated as America’s greatest violinist—better than Maud Powell or Isaac Stern (though the latter pushed himself like potato chips) and the equal of Yehudi Menuhin, who later gave up his American citizenship in order to adopt Great Britain. He was unique among the great violinists of his time in that he wasn’t born of an émigré family, he wasn’t neurotic, depressed, homosexual or an addict of any kind. His temperament as a person was even and mostly calm; little if anything rattled him, including audiences. He just happened to have a sensuous yet exciting tone, superb technique and a heartfelt yet highly musical style. Yet in many ways he has been marginalized and forgotten, partly due to this now-antiquated way of playing which included a steady (but not overripe) vibrato and the use of portamento. In short, he was more the American version of Fritz Kreisler than of Jascha Heifetz, but while the former is still considered an icon because he was Viennese (and, therefore, to the manner born), Spalding has been pushed aside.

Yet if one listens to his best recordings—hard to find in one place and often reissued with a ton of surface noise burying the beauty of his playing—one will discover a sincere artist and a distinct personality. Beneath the layers of vibrato and portamento was a sincere artist whose performances were deeply heartfelt, a rock-solid technique that was admired by his peers as well as by such pedagogues as Carl Flesch, Joseph Joachim and Leopold Auer. In fact, when Spalding played in Russia in 1914, Auer brought his entire class of pupils—which at the time included Thelma Given, Toscha Seidel and a 13-year-old boy named Jascha Heifetz. Yet in his home country, it took more than a decade for critics to recognize him as the great artist he was, simply because he was American and thus didn’t have the right ethnic background to be playing music that they felt was “over his head.”

Spalding was born on August 15, 1888 to James Walter and Maria Boardman Spalding. His uncle Albert, after whom he was named, was a famous baseball pitcher (the first to wear a glove when playing) and manager (for the Chicago White Stockings) who wrote the rules of the game (he later called for a committee to investigate the false claim that Abner Doubleday created baseball) and, after retirement, founded the first sporting goods manufacturing company in America, of which his brother, Albert’s father, was named President. Thus although his parents weren’t wealthy when he was born, they became wealthy by the time he was 10 years old.

The legend has been spread for years that Albert’s family, involved as they were in sporting goods, were opposed to his wanting to become a violinist, but that’s not entirely true. His mother had, after all, been a contralto before her marriage to Jim Spalding, and from the very start his parents paid for all of his lessons—first with private teachers in New York City, then at the Paris and Bologna Conservatories, graduating from the latter with honors at the age of 14 (1902). Yet he felt he wasn’t yet ready to make his debut, and so waited four years before playing for the first time at the Nouveau Théâtre in Paris on June 6, 1906, then in the principal towns of France, Austria, Germany, Italy, and England. One of his most memorable early concerts was when he played the Saint-Saëns Violin Sonata with the composer himself at the piano. He received glowing reviews everywhere he performed, yet was still ignored by his own countrymen (and countrywomen).

After making his American debut with Saint-Saëns’ Violin Concerto No. 3 in a concert with the New York Symphony on November 8, 1908, Spalding received strongly opposing critical reviews. Henry Krehbiel in the New York Tribune accused him of “rasping, raucous, snarling, unmusical sounds,” but Walter Damrosch, who conducted the performance, called him “the first great instrumentalist this country has produced.” Pianist André Benoist, who later became Spalding’s permanent accompanist from 1908 until 1950, explained the origin of Krehbiel’s verbal vitriol in his autobiography:

This Krehbiel I knew well, having traveleed with him when he was giving learned lectures on the English version of Parsifal…in my conversations with him, I found that he gathered most of his information from different reference works and encyclopedias, which anyone of us could have done equally well, given the time to devote to this sort of research. His judgment, I found, was tinged on all things by what he either read or heard [from others]. And this was one of the high Gods that sat in judgment of an artist’s value to the world![1]

Fortunately, Spalding’s career proceeded well, since audiences liked him immensely. In 1909 he soloed with the Dresden Philharmonic Orchestra when that orchestra toured the United States. In 1916, he was recognized as a national honorary member of Phi Mu Alpha Sinfonia, the national fraternity for men in music. And contrary to Henry Krehbiel’s nasty judgment, “Thomas Edison analyzed Spalding’s tone with electronic equipment and found it to be the purest of any living violinist he had heard; this led to a twenty-year ‘contract’ during which Spalding made over a hundred records.”[2]

One of the more interesting documents, because it shows exactly what a well-balanced character Spalding had even as a young man, comes from a rare interview in The Strad of January 1907 by one B. Henderson (not to be confused with the distinguished New York critic W.J. Henderson). I quote part of it here so that the reader can ascertain some of Spalding’s laid-back, no-nonsense personality:

“Tell me a little about yourself,” I say as we settle down for a chat. “Well, I don’t know what to tell you that is of any interest to the public.” “Is that your celebrated Montagnana violin,” I ask, as he carefully puts away the instrument from which he has just been drawing such clear silvery tones.

“Yes, that is the violin that was given to me by my grandmother on my first appearance in Paris the year before last. I could have had my choice of two Strads at a higher price, but I don’t consider either of them equalled to this one in tone. It was very funny when I played in Bristol last week to hear the remarks passed on it. A rumor had gone round that it was a very expensive instrument, and one lady was heard to remark that the violin I was playing on cost £10,000!”

“Are you nervous when playing in public?” “No, I cannot say that I am. I am naturally a little excited before playing, but once on the platform I enjoy it. The only time I ever remember feeling nervous was when I was to play with Saint-Saëns at the Pergola theatre in Florence. I had heard that he was sometimes a little abrupt with musicians that did not please him, and as I was to play his compositions I was naturally a little anxious. However, I found him perfectly charming and most kind.”

Mr. Spalding does not add that the great French composer expressed himself delighted at the violinist’s interpretation of his great concerto, but this is a fact which I learned from other sources.”Do you practice a great deal?”: “No—that is to say I have never over-practised. Many average is about three hours daily, but I always make it a point never to let a day pass without working if I can help it. In travelling about it is sometimes difficult to arrange, but at home I do a great deal of work, also at harmony and composition.”

“Have you any other hobbies besides music?” “Yes, I am passionately fond of sport, but there are certain forms in which I dare not indulge, as I like to keep my hands supple.”

“What is your favorite school of music?” “All music that is good appeals to me, but, if I have any preference, it is for the German classical school. Bach and Beethoven are my ideals in music, which, I suppose, is the reason for my great admiration for Joachim.”

“Have you ever met him?” “Yes, I spent some time with him at his home in Berlin and played for him, and I shall not easily forget his kindness and encouragement.”

So there you have, more or less, Albert Spalding in a nutshell. His head was screwed on straight; he had no hang-ups and, unlike his accompanist André Benoist, who was prejudiced against blacks, Spalding was very open-minded since his mother had a highly competent and personally esteemed black handmaiden named Nannie who was taken by the Spalding family all over the world when they traveled and treated as one of the family. Even more interesting was his reaction to Benoist’s horror about his enlisting in the Army Air Force in World War I, that he wasn’t considering the possibility that he might damage or lose his “precious” hands. Spalding angrily reacted as follows:

Spalding in uniform

Spalding in uniform, 1917

“All you say is beside the point and only evades the real issue. In the first place, my hands are no more precious than any other individual [emphasis mine] who does work conscientiously and with loving care. In the second place, I have no responsibilities except my own, as I am not married [Spalding married after the War]m hav no children, and my immediate family is able to care for itself. And as for me, I have to live with myself, and could not do this comfortably knowing that other men, be they steam fitters, miners, painters, etc., were going to give their all in the defense of their country, while I, being fortunate enough to have a profession that makes for a comfortable living, stood by and watched them for the dirty work! NO! Let anyone who feels that his hands are too precious to risk them in this drama keep out of it. I do not blame them for the thought; but I could never reconcile such a thought with my personal feelings in the matter.” [3]

As was to be expected, however, the Army Air Service used him primarily in espionage assignments and as a code-breaker. At once point, he was aide-de-camp to then-Comgressman Fiorello La Guardia, but his top secret work must have saved lives because after his discharge he was awarded the Cross of the Crown of Italy.

Although Spalding was much older when World War II began (53) and had in fact been married by then for 22 years, he was contacted and asked if he would return to help his country. He again consented. According to Wikipedia, “Assistant Secretary of State Adolf Berle successfully urged Spalding to work for the Office of Strategic Services. He was posted to London, for six weeks, and then served in North Africa until he was ordered to Naples where he was attached to the Psychological Warfare Division of SHAEF. (Supreme Headquarters Allied Expeditionary Forces).”

But André Benoist was more specific in describing his duties, which were far more dangerous than his decoding work in World War I. Because of his knowledge of both the language and culture, Spalding was put in charge of the Italian underground in Naples under the code name Major Sheridan. Had he been found out, he would surely have been killed on the spot by Fascist thugs. Yet he hung in and stayed with it for two years. The website DeseretNews adds this detail to an astonishing impromptu concert that he gave in 1944:

An incident much publicized in the Italian press and which indicates something of the resourcefulness, alertness and courage of the man occurred during an especially severe bombing raid in Naples. Everyone was forced to take refuge in shelters. Spalding was in a shelter with several hundred others. The crowd was near panic. Noticing a man with a violin case, Spalding asked him if he might borrow his instrument for a while. Then he quickly launched into an unaccompanied rendition of the Beethoven Violin Concerto. The crowd, inspired by Beethoven’s heroic music and Spalding’s heroic behavior, soon calmed down.[4]

Among his many good qualities, Spalding was not jealous of any other violinist, not even Fritz Kreisler whose playing was so similar to his own or the phenomenally gifted Jascha Heifetz, who Benoist accompanied during the year-plus when Spalding was serving in the military.

Undoubtedly the funniest back-handed compliment ever paid to Spalding came from an elderly woman who approached him after one concert in a small Southern American town. According to Benoist, she breathlessly told the violinist with enthusiasm, “Ah, Mr. Spalding, I have heard them all, since I was a little girl, and I’ll tell you what the trouble is with all of them. They’re all technique and no soul, whereas you…you’re all soul and no technique!” Not realizing the full import of what she had just said, the old lady walked away triumphantly with a fixed smile on her face while Spalding laughed out loud.[5]

Spalding poster

Spalding returned tho concertizing after the War, but his sun was starting to set. By the time he and Benoist parted company in 1948, a new rival had appears on the scene, the much younger Isaac Stern. Although Stern had nowhere near the beauty of tone of Spalding or Menuhin, he had a powerful agent who pushed him like potato chips. In addition to concertizing and radio, he also performed in movies and on television, which Spalding never did, and Goddard Lieberson of Columbia Records pushed his career as well.

After a New York concert at the end of May 1950, Spalding announced his retirement from the concert stage, although he did continue to make recordings. During this later phase of his career he taught at the Boston University College of Music and, in the winter months, at Florida State University, and he did occasionally played recitals at these venues. His last recital, with pianist Jules Wolffers, was given at Boston College on May 15, 1953; 10 days later he died in New York, a few months shy of his 65th birthday. Since no one lists the cause of death online, I would assume that it was something quick like a heart attack that felled him. Thus did the life and career of an outstanding musician come to an end.

We turn now to what I feel are the best recordings Spalding has left us. You can access them on the Internet Archive by clicking HERE.

1-3.  Brahms: Sonata for Piano & Violin No. 2 in A, Op. 100 (Ernö von Dohnányi, pianist)

Brahms sonatas LP coverOften considered to be the weakest of Brahms’ three violin sonatas, possibly because the piano part often overshadows the violin, Spalding gives it just the right touch. This was his second recording of the piece; his first was made with Benoist for Victor. Even his portamento seems to suit Brahms to a T, just as Bronislaw Huberman’s does in the Violin Concerto (Brahms heard Huberman play his concerto and admired it immensely), yet he is content to let Ernő von Dohnányi, a superb pianist in addition to being a good composer, “lead” him in this work, which is the right way to approach it. If you pay close attention to the music, you’ll note that what the violin plays is often in reaction to what the piano has played just before him. In addition, Spalding’s superb sense of line and structure gives his playing much more “sweep” than we now hear from modern violinists. They could all learn a thing or three from listening to Spalding’s recordings of standard repertoire—and beyond. And please note than when the music calls for more “bite” and less lyricism, Spalding is ready to present that aspect of it, too.

4-7. Brahms: Sonata for Piano & Violin No. 3 in D min., Op. 108 (Dohnanyi, pianist)

The more popular and tighter-written third sonata remains a favorite with both violinists and pianists, and this duo really digs under the music’s surface. The second movement, pitched very low for the violin, is almost in the viola range, and Spalding handles this assignment very well. In the second movement, note how even his trills are; very few players, even today, can match him on this.

8-10. Dohnányi: Violin Sonata (Dohnányi, pianist)

Dohnányi’s violin sonata is just as lyrical but more dynamic and, at times, more dramatic that either Brahms sonata they recorded, and Spalding is near perfection here, particularly the added Slavic “bite” in Spalding’s violin tone. (These are the kind of notes that sound particularly harsh on recordings, but terribly exciting when heard “live.”)

11-12. Spalding: Excerpts from “Etchings” (Benoist, pianist)

Although Spalding was not a great composer, as we shall see he was often better than average. Etchings was a 10-part suite of which the last eight pieces were relatively tame, but the evocative “Desert Twilight” and the eerie “Ghosts” are clearly among his finest pieces. The high passage near the end of “Desert Twilight” almost sounds like a clarinet, so pure is his tone. (I had to do some radical cleaning-up of these sides, which only appeared on an old Biddulph release from the early 1990s and had no noise filtering done to them.) I’d hold up “Ghosts,” in particular, to any modern-day violin piece of a similar nature.

  1. Sibelius: Valse Triste (violin-piano transcription) (Benoist, pianist)

Valse Triste labelMy regular readers know that I generally loathe transcriptions of music for instruments that were never expected to play those pieces, but I make an exception for this almost heartbreaking rendition of Valse Triste. Spalding plays it like a man whose grief is beyond tears; he does not cry on your shoulder. On the contrary, he is crying inside, and you can feel it. This, the only acoustic recording I chose for my survey, was an Edison Diamond Disc from 1923, and anyone familiar with these remarkable artifacts knows that Edison was able to capture the sound of soprano voices and violins much better in the acoustic process than anyone else. In fact, Spalding preferred his Edison records to any others, claiming that they captured his tone perfectly whereas Victor did not. Even so, I had to spend nearly 20 minutes removing all the clicks and most of the overwhelming surface noise that otherwise covered up this remarkable performance.

  1. Spalding: Dragon Fly, a Study in Arpeggios

Although Spalding’s technique was never quite as supernatural (in both the realistic and metaphoric senses of the word) as Jascha Heifetz’, even Heifetz admired Spalding’s ability to play the fastest technical passages with perfect balance, meaning that each note was equal in volume and touch to every other note. (Musicians call it articulation.) I’m not surprised that modern violinists don’t attempt to play Dragon Fly, since it’s even more difficult than Paganini’s Moto perpetuo but not as catchy to the ear. Note here, too, Spalding’s uncanny ability to create a real “line” in the music from start to finish even when dazzling the ear with pyrotechnics.

  1. Beethoven: Violin Concerto in D, II. Larghetto – excerpt (Austrian Symphony Orchestra, Wilhelm Lobner, cond.)

Although this is clearly not the 1940s performance that Spalding played in that Neapolitan shelter, the otherworldly beauty of his timbre and his superb ability to craft a continuous line of music was never shows to better advantage than it is here. Very few violinists have come close to this.

  1. Barber: Violin Concerto – III. Presto in moto perpetuo (Phildelphia Orchestra, cond. Eugene Ormandy)

I’m not at all fond of the first two movements of this concerto, which I consider to be pretty drippy music and inferior Samuel Barber, but this final movement is not only fascinating musically but a real ass-kicker. The irony is that the pianist for whom this concerto was commissioned, Iso Briselli, was the one who insisted on a more virtuosic last movement and then, after Barber had written it and had an advanced violin student at Curtis play it at a “test run” for the concerto in 1940, Briselli said he hated it and wouldn’t play it!And no other violinist save Heifetz could possibly have played it with such evenness in each and every note. I’ve listened to other “great” violinists of today, among them Hillary Hahn and Gil Shaham, and none of them play it as perfectly, or with anywhere near the continuity of musical line, as Spalding did. NONE of them.

17-20. Franck: Violin Sonata in A (André Benoist, pianist)

This was one of Spalding’s specialty pieces as it also was for Jacques Thibaud. An interesting sidelight is that accompanist André Benoist was with Franck on the day he suddenly collapsed and died amidst the students who loved him. Both participants throw their hearts into this recorded performance, which in my view is the finest ever made of this piece (although Heifetz and Rubinstein come close).

  1. Chopin: Waltz in B min., Op. 69 No. 2 (André Benoist, pianist)

Chopin Waltz labelYet another transcription that actually works, mostly because, although Spalding plays with great feeling, he purposely avoids pathos or bathos in his approach. All of his feeling is in his timbre, not in any extra added sentiment.

22-25. Spalding: Sonata in E for Violin Alone

This extremely interesting work was published by the Volkwein Brothers in Pittsburgh in 1948. That much is known and provable, but when and where this recording of it was made is a mystery. It just popped up one day on YouTube, so I said “Thank you very much,” streamed and recorded it. It is clearly Spalding’s masterpiece, written in a style not unlike that of Bartók or Martinů, and parts of it are very challenging technically for the violinist. To aid you in your listening, I have attached the complete PDF score which you can access by clicking HERE.

26-28. Mozart: Sinfonia Concertnte in E-flat, K. 364 (William Primrose, viola; New Friends of Music Orch., cond. Fritz Stiedry)

This was Spalding’s one and only orchestrally-accompanied recording for Victor, made in May 1941. He is joined on this set by the distinguished American violist, William Primrose, with the “New Friends of Music Orchestra” (members of the NBC Symphony) conducted by Fritz Stiedry. Stiedry later became Rudolf Bing’s right-hand man at the Metropolitan Opera, where his performances were stodgy and lacking any musical grace, but aside from the dated, boxy sound this performance is surprisingly modern in concept and execution, with a lean orchestral profile. brisk tempi and plenty of energy. It was later reissued on an RCA Camden LP after Spalding’s death.

  1. Sarasate: Zapateado, Op. 23 No. 2 (André Benoist, pianist)

Zapateado labelOne last encore piece in which Spalding is accompanied by Benoist. Although the violinist absolutely detested his Brunswick recordings because of their boxy sound, modern audio editors can do wonders with restoring his brightness of tone, and this is yet another perfect example of his long-lined musical phrasing even in the fastest and most virtuosic passages.

Despite the best efforts of the Historically-Informed Performance Mafia to shove straight tone down our throats, violinists like Spalding, Elman and Huberman do not deserve to be forgotten except as historical figures. They were highly prized by the very composers the HIP crowd now thinks they are serving, but are not, and their style is much closer to the composers’ conception of their music. I urge you to listen to all of these recordings and then make up your own mind.

—© 2024 Lynn René Bayley

Follow me on Facebook (as Monique Musique)

Check out the books on my blog…they’re worth reading, trust me!

[1] The Accompanist: An Autobiography of André Benoist, Paganiniana Publications, 1978, p. 157.

[2] This and other info on Spalding’s career from Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Spalding_(violinist)

[3] Benoist, ibid, pp. 257-259.

[4] https://www.deseret.com/1988/9/22/18778902/celebrating-the-spalding-centennial

[5] Benoist, ibid, p. 261.

Standard

Von Wyl Revisits the “Lockdown Circus”

cover

LOCKDOWN CIRCUS / Opening. Magician. Dancer. Lion. Juggler. Clown. Closing (Luzia von Wyl) / Luzia von Wyl, pno w/This Is Pan: Lukas Thoeni, tp; Matthias Kohler, a-sax; Dave Gisler, gt; André Pousaz, bs; Gregor Hilbe, dm / LU 002, also available for free streaming on YouTube beginning HERE.

This second release on Luzia von Wyl’s own label is a departure for her since she is not playing here with her own ensemble. This is Pan is a Suisse-Deutsch quintet that brands their music as “elastic jazz” but has a very small online footprint. Try as I might, I could not find a home page for the group, and although they have several videos uploaded on YouTube I also could not find a single issued CD by them although there are clips from a self-produced album titled Animal Heart. The driving force of the group is alto saxist and sometimes clarinetist Matthias Kohler, who also writes several of their pieces.

During the Coronavirus pandemic, This is Pan recorded a series of performances which they later put up in YouTube under the collective title “All Ears.” In these performances, they invited other European jazz artists to join them, Among the invitees were trumpeter-composer Sonja Ott, bassist Lisa Hoppe and guitarist Dimitri Howald. Luzia was one of these and, like the others, she brought some of her own compositions with her—but not just one or two. Rather, she wrote an entire album’s worth of new pieces exclusively for this ensemble.

It was a bit of a stretch for her since the makeup of This is Pan has a very different sound profile from her own ensemble. In place of the usual classical instruments she uses are the brighter, more aggressive sounds of a trumpet, alto saxophone and an electric guitarist. Yet not only did she succeed in enveloping these different sounds into her normal aesthetic, she has outdone herself in creating music that, for the most part, is built differently from the music she usually writes for her own group.

This is Pan

Matthias Kohler (on clarinet) and trumpeter Lukas Thoeni

Comparing Matthias Kohler’s compositions for his group to those of von Wyl, one is immediately made aware of the differences. Kohler is an excellent jazz improviser who writes interesting pieces for his ensemble, but von Wyl is a great composer whose work has more layers to it than Kohler’s. And, to be honest, I don’t even know if von Wyl is a great jazz soloist, since she invariably minimizes her contribution to the ensemble to playing background figures. I can’t recall ever hearing her play an improvised solo on any of her recordings. Her biggest contribution to all of the records she appears on is through the richness and complexity of her writing, so let us examine each of these seven pieces in order.

Opening starts with a starling alto sax wail by Kohler which leads into an a cpapella theme; when the music proper starts, it is in a fast 3 with the rhythm divided up quarter note-quarter note-two eighths with von Wyl pumping it out on the piano as the bitonal and rather freaky theme is played in double time by trumpet and sax. There is a short break in the middle in which the 3/4 time is slowed down to half, and in the second half of the theme statement von Wyl uses descending chromatics to enhance the strangeness. Guitarist Dave Gisler plays a solo that uses a bit of fusion but is primarily an extended jazz solo, and a very complex one at that, throwing in a bit of electronic distortion here and there. In his second chorus, trumpet and sax play a little figure which they interject into the mix. It’s a very dynamic piece, not really typical of von Wyl’s other work with her own ensemble, and for once the rhythm stays relative steady and driving rather than somewhat fluid. Von Wyl plays a little running figure over the finale.

Magician opens with the pianist playing yet another 3/4 theme, but here the tempo is more relaxed and the theme alternates between rhythmic and melodic figures. The tempo suddenly shifts into 4 as Kohler plays an excellent alto solo incorporating a bit of bitonality. Von Wyl’s piano emphasizes the rhythm even more strongly than bassist André Pousaz, over which Thoeni plays a very fine, Chet Baker-like solo. Much of the following chorus sounds written out as a variant on the theme. A few tinkled piano notes ends it.

Dancer is written in the very odd time signature of 11/8 under a minor-key theme with a distinctively “European” sound to it (think of the kind of music you heard in Fellini films). This then suddenly shifts to a very fast 4 as trumpet and sax, playing together play an almost circus-like tune, provided your circus performers are double-jointed fraks who can twist themselves into human pretzels! Then the tempo gradually decelerates; the music stops; then von Wyl plays an entirely different theme which decelerates still further, leading into a particularly atmospheric Gisler solo. The “dancing” has apparently come to an end…but wait! After another full stop, here comes the 11/8 theme reprised, this time with the measure time extended at the ends of phrases so that drummer  Hilbe can play some extra beats, which in turn leads to his solo, on which the piece ends, leading without a break into—

Lion, a slow, atmospheric piece that is closer in mood and feeling to her usual Ensemble music. Here, Hilbe creates a cross-surrent of drum patterns behind von Wyl and Pousaz as Gisler drops out. Kohler plays an extended (improvised) solo that apparently replaces a written theme. Then, a rarity, a von Wyl solo, using sparse single bass notes with a few chords in it as trumpet and sax first play interjections, then a written theme, out of which Kohler again emerges as soloist. Different written figures for trumpet and sax follow, then another Gisler solo. The last chorus sounds like a written-out group improvisation on the theme; von Wyl rides it out with guitar and drums.

Juggler appears to be written in a “normal” four, but in every fourth bar there is one beat mussing, so I would probably describe it as being in 15/4 (although it probably just switches from 4 to 3 every four bars). Juggling, indeed! By and large, however, this is a relaxed tune with a surprisingly simple melody, giving us a respite from all the hyper-activity of the preceding works. Once again, von Wyl plays a solo break (which sounds written out) leading to a Thoeni solo sans rhythm section. Then the bass and drums enter, which turns the rhythm into something more complex as Thoeni really stretches out. Kohler then comes in behind him as they play a duo-improvisation (not really a chase chorus). the tempo accelerates, then slows back down again; von Wyl plays her little figures in the break before returning to the theme.

Clown is not really a humorous piece at all, but a slow, ruminating piece. The piano again opens the proceedings, and here von Wyl stretches out more than she normally does, but surprisingly, in a classical manner with the feeling of a love ballad (with some “gingerbread” played by the right hand). Pousaz gets a rare bass solo over her piano, intelligently and skillfully played, much of it in double time as von Wyl occasionally tweaks the harmony with some augmented chords. Then it’s back to the slow, simple tempo with long lines played first by Koehler and then by Koehler and Thoeni. The way they play this one, it almost sounds as if time is standing still. the music floats across bar lines in a manner similar to some of Charles Mingus’ compositions. At one point on the repeat, the underlying harmony changes for two bars, which surprises the listener, but by and large this is a sad clown sitting in his dressing room, ruminating over the sadness of the Coronavirus lockdown. This then moves without pause into—

Closing. More aggressive than the previous two pieces but not quite as aggressive as Opening, it, too is in an odd meter, with von Wyl playing the steady bass ostinato on piano. There’s a remarkable passage in which trumpet and alto sax become entangled in some wild interlaced passages, a 3/4 break, and other devices that enliven the piece and intrigue the listener, such as von Wyl suddenly playing atonal chord clusters on the piano and Gisler tossing in unexpected if brief guitar breaks.

Another interesting feature of this set is that not only is von Wyl stretching her musical vocabulary to fit this different band, but This is Pan itself is playing a different style from their normal “elastic jazz” fare, tighter and funkier in its rhythm and using far edgier figures than in most of their own compositions. My only complaint about this CD was its brevity, a little under 40 minutes total, but this is clearly a case of high quality music over more music with less substance.

—© 2024 Lynn René Bayley

Follow me on Facebook (as Monique Musique)

Check out the books on my blog…they’re worth reading, trust me!

Standard

Quartetto Sincronie Plays Malipiero…and Monteverdi??

cover

MALIPIERO: String Quartets Nos. 2, 3 & 6. MONTEVERDI: Messa a Quattro Voci: Kyrie, Gloria, Credo, Sanctus, Benedictus, Agnus Dei / Quartetto Sincronie / Stradivarius STR 37281

This rather strange disc combines three of Malipiero’s eight string quartets with movements from Monteverdi’s Messa a Quattro Voci from 1650, for no reason that is explained in the liner notes. In fact, the notes only describe (in detail) the Malipiero quartets and don’t even touch on Monteverdi’s music. Moreover, Quartetto Sincronie buys into the Nazi-like ramming of straight tone in older music down the throats of every string player on the planet who even dares to perform music from this period.

I have said it before, numerous times, but I’ll say it again. I did extensive research into the authentic performing style of Baroque string players as well as singers in the late 1970s-early ‘80s. My research took me three years to complete, and what I found was this:

Very few singers other than the castrati sang with what we now call “straight tone.” On the contrary, 90% of singers used vibrato in their singing. It was clearly not the heavy, overripe and sometimes fluctuating vibrato that we hear from many opera singers today; on the contrary, the vibrato was generally a steady emission, generally a tight vibrato that added a shimmer to the sound, occasionally a more pronounced one, but always an EVEN vibrato. And string players emulated the singers in their playing. They used a light, shimmering vibrato in all held notes, only reverting to straight tone for the fast passages—as the singers themselves did. They also used what we now call “grace notes” frequently; the singers in particular and the castrati specifically liked to “launch” a high note with a grace note or accacciatura an octave BELOW the target note. This can be heard in the recordings of the only castrato to make records, Alessandro Moreschi. Moreover, both singers AND string players used a lot of portamento effects in their performances. One of the best and most authentic of the historically-informed violinists was Sigiswald Kuijken, although Kuijken frequently omitted vibrato from held notes.

String players, and especially string sections in orchestras, who DID use constant straight tone were considered to be crude and unfinished artists. They were often relegated to the “provincial” orchestras, and when such orchestras played concerts the more sophisticated listeners always sat at the back of the hall in which they performed because their sound was considered to be too harsh when heard up close. It was also considered to be unmusical. There are several written reports documenting this, but the Straight Tone Mafia blithely ignores all of this, so what we get are cold, harsh sounds that sound more like a MIDI or a cat whining than like music.

To their credit, however, Quartetto Sincronie minimizes the more abrasive qualities of this sound, in part because they all have beautiful timbres. In addition, they understand the basics of Monteverdi’s style well enough to make a good case for their phrasing, which is extraordinary and not what one normally hears nowadays; but by completely omitting vibrato they omit much of the feeling.

Interestingly, their performances of the Malipiero Quartets includes only a bit of vibrato; apparently, they’ve been conditioned to play even 20th-century music in a 17th or 18th-century manner, but on the other hand they introduce a feeling of Italian elegance into Maliipero’s music that is often lacking in others’ performances. Comparing their versions of these quartets to the more famous ones by Quartetto d’Archi di Venezia on Dynamic, one hears a less forceful style of playing and a “smoothing out” of the dynamic contrasts which the Venetians revel in. This, however, gives the music a more linear form although it is less exciting on the surface. In addition, Quartetto Sincronie’s performances are somewhat slower and more relaxed than Quartetto d’Archi di Venezio’s. But the biggest difference is in the sound quality of the recording itself. The Venetians were recorded in an over-reverberant space that made some of their playing, particularly the loud passages, sound harsh and abrasive, while Quartetto Sincronie is recorded in a much more natural acoustic with just a bit of natural hall reverb.

All of this adds up to performances which are more elegant and, in the more explosive passages, a bit easier on the ear. Although I still prefer the Venetians’ readings because of their somewhat quicker tempi and more exciting drive, I can accept what Quartetto Sincronie does here because it is not that far removed from what is in the scores. And at least in Malipiero’s music they have a wonderful singing quality that they also, at times, apply to their Monteverdi.

The bottom line is that I hope that Quartetto Sincronie is able to record the other five Malipiero String Quartets. These would make an interesting alternate set to the Venetians’ that would present the music in a cleaner acoustic without sacrificing too much in the way of drama.

—© 2024 Lynn René Bayley

Follow me on Facebook (as Monique Musique)

Check out the books on my blog…they’re worth reading, trust me!

Standard

Hakim Plays Hakim (Vol. 1)

cover

HAKIM: Bach’orama. Jonquiles. Mit seinem Geist, Variations on “Ein feste Burg.” Theotokos. Salve Regina. Gershwinesca / Naji Hakim, org / Signum Classics SIGCD284

And here, at long last, is the “Vol. 1” that corresponds to the “Vol. 2” with which I opened this series of reviews. The album opens with a lively, fun piece, Bach’orama, which Hakim turns into music that almost sounds like it is meant for a carillon (or merry-go-round to you Yanks), albeit with some tone cluster harmonies and bitonal passages thrown in just for fun. He tosses in a quote from Wachet auf among others. He then proceeds to play three organ preludes titled Jonquilles, the first of which is merely pleasant but the second and third of which are complex, the second consisting of right-hand swirls of sound while the left, in a different registration, plays an odd melody line. and the third of which becomes involved in some dense harmonies.

Mit Meinem Geist presents Hakim’s own variations on the Lutheran theme song, Ein Feste Berg, and these are remarkable indeed. In fact, unless you are listening for this tune, you will not recognize it at all in the opening variation, so complex is the way he transforms it—including one remarkable passage where the rhythm appears to be running backwards. This is truly a demanding, virtuosic work, but also one in which the organist’s technique is subservient to an astonishingly creative piece. In the second variation, Hakim transports Luther to the Middle East, creating a mysterious envelope which wraps around the theme. The third variant simply has him ruminating in the left hand around a relatively straightforward rendition of the theme in the right. (I’ve noticed that this is one of Hakim’s little musical tricks, assigning left and right-hand parts in the reverse of what the listener expects.) All in all, another very creative piece. and in the fifth variation (“Largo”) he so transforms the theme that it isn’t even recognizable to the advanced listener, changing some of the notes and again using Eastern modes rather than the usual Western chord changes. More than any of his other pieces that I’ve heard, this set of variations blurs the lines between Western and Middle Eastern music the most thoroughly and successfully.

The second movement of Theotokas is one of the most mystical pieces Hakim has written, and in the next section, titled “Danse,” Hakim keeps the volume low and the textures clear while playing somewhat more conventional music—until near the end, when he suddenly doubles the tempo and becomes bitonal; and this then moves into the next piece, “Incantation,” without a break, suddenly increasing the volume, throwing in more clashing harmonies yet also using a minor-key melodic line that echoes the Middle East once again. Surprisingly, the next variant, though labeled “Prière” or “Prayer,” opens with a rhythm that sounds quasi-Latin but then moves into more minor key harmonies which subtly shifts it yet differently, this time back to the Middle East, and the finale is both complex in melody and harmony as well as constantly changing tempi and mood.

Although his Salve Regina is religious music, it is a harmonically interesting piece, but the fantastic Gershwinesca is one of his wildest works, drawing not so much on Gershwin’s quasi-classical pieces as his songs, including I Got Rhythm, Swanee, How Long Has This Been Going On? and Nice Work if You Can Get It!

My final verdict on Naji Hakim is that although he is not as wildly creative as Jean Guillou was, he is clearly head and shoulders above any other modern-day organist-composer I’ve heard and more stylistically diverse than Guillou. Another difference between them is that, although Guillou played standard hymns and a good selection of J.S. Bach’s organ works during his long tenure, he did not base much of his original compositions on hymns and religious songs as Hakim does. This is not meant as a criticism of Hakim, merely an explanation of what a good amount of his organ music is based on. But as a composer Hakim is fascinating if different from his predecessors and his range of musical styles is far wider than any modern composer I’ve heard. Even such a genius as, for instance, Kalevi Aho has at most three differing styles which he switches between while Hakim has six or seven. Moreover, Hakim often takes the listener by surprise by starting a piece in one style and then suddenly jumping into a contrasting one that is entirely different. Perhaps, then, Hakim is more of a clever craftsman than an inspired genius, but his music is, for the most part, fascinating and often intense except when he’s in one of his resolutely Romantic moods, which on balance don’t seem to hit him that often. I will certainly look out for further releases of his music, and I hope that my survey has helped you grasp the character and quality of these pieces he has recorded.

—© 2024 Lynn René Bayley

Follow me on Facebook (as Monique Musique)

Check out the books on my blog…they’re worth reading, trust me!

Standard

Hakim’s Chamber Music

cover

HAKIM: Páskeblonst for String Quartet. Magnificat for Soprano & Organ. Variations on “Wie schön leuchtet der Morgenstern” for Violin & Organ. Set Me as a Seal Upon Your Heart for Soprano & Organ. Caprice for Violin & Organ. Amazing Grace for Soprano & Organ. Die Taube for Soprano & String Quartet / Quatuor de la Chapelle Royale; Naji Hakim, org; Rima Tawil, sop; Jean-Philippe Kuzma, vln / Signum Classics SIGCD245

This is probably the most unusual CD in Naji Hakim’s discography as it focuses entirely on his chamber music, the most substantial work being his string quartet. This is based on a theme by Carl Nielsen that sounds very “churchy” to me, but from the first variation onwards it becomes more complex and interesting although that first variant begins in a strictly tonal style until two-thirds of the way through, when the harmony suddenly “disintegrates.” Maybe it’s my ears, but the Quatuor de la Chapelle Royale sounds just a twinge out of tune in one of the violins to me.

The second variation is bitonal, a fairly short pizzicato adventure, while the third is a slow lament which, again, opens in a firmly tonal manner, with a few bars that were clearly influenced by Sibelius’ Valse triste, and yet again it becomes bitonal and even leaning a bit towards atonality in the later, faster section—and then stops in the middle of nowhere before moving, after a pause, to the next variant. Hakim’s ability to write in several different styles puts him at an advantage over those composers who only have one voice, and as the quartet progresses we har the entire range of these styles. It is a quartet that operates more on the surface of things rather than reaching for profundity, but the surface is utterly fascinating, creating a virtual kaleidoscope of sound textures, and none of the music sounds “studied” or perfunctory.

Rima Tawil is again our soprano in the works for soprano and organ, and if anything her singing is even unsteadier here than on the Phèdre cantata reviewed previously. In fact, her wobble is so bad that at times it sounds as if she is singing in a bitonal manner. Better the just bypass these fracks; for all their musical interest, the singing is so awful that it makes your ears bleed. (But she’s a real knockout and she’s Lebanese, like Hakim, so you can figure out why he chose her.) The Variations on “Wie schön leuchtet der Morgenstern” are, unfortunately, rather sappy and Romantic in style, not my kind of music; the Capriccioso is also tonal but much more interesting.

In toto, then, this is a relatively weak album in the Hakim series, with too many sweetsy-Romantic pieces to suit me, although Die Taube for soprano and string quartet is clearly the most interesting of the pieces that Tawil butchers with her defective voice, but I still recommend the String Quartet very highly.

—© 2024 Lynn René Bayley

Follow me on Facebook (as Monique Musique)

Check out the books on my blog…they’re worth reading, trust me!

Standard